What is Bible?

Who is Jesus?

Was there the  

Why Jesus is 
the only way

Shroud of Turin 

confirms Bible

Science and Religion

What is Evolution?

Coded Bible

About the Jews 

Prostitute -the 
false church

Society of Jesus 

Knights of a Temple 



Blood of Satan 
- Cain

Fallen Angels

Devil creations

Here are dragons

Fairys, Naga...Gods

Are genetic defects - 
price of evolution? 

Another World

Aliens or old gods?


His Name  

How old the mankind?

Book of Daniel

"Revelation" of John

The signs of times 

Mark of the beast

Let me introduce:  Satan

The will of God

Prayer of Jesus




More often essences with the changed genetic code are incapable to live or they live not for a long time. Thus, the majority of mutations lead to extinction instead of development. Besides, mutations are very rare: approximately 1:100.000. Therefore mutations could  never execute the requirements of evolution.

Professor G. G. Simpson reports that the mathematical probability of getting good evolutionary results would occur only once in 274 billion years! And that would be assuming 100 million individuals reproducing a new generation every day! He concludes by saying: " Obviously...such a process has played no part whatever in evolution.." *

Evolutionists assert  that the amoeba  in the coarse of time turned into an invertebrate , which became an amphibian, then a reptile, a quadruped, an ape form, and finally a man. In other words, all species are in constant process of changing. This means that among ancient fossils of animal world should be millions of examples of mutated essences: half-developed fish, which are ready to become an amphibian, and reptiles half-transformed into birds, and mammals resembling monkeys and human beings.. However instead of finding those billions of confused family fossils, the scientists found exactly the opposite. Not a single hybrid was found.. Everything stays within the well-defined limits of its own basic kind.

In Genesis (1:25)it is said: «And God made the animals of the earth after their kind, and cattle after his kind, and every thing that crept upon the earth after their kind».  The word "kind" refers to species, or a family.  Each created family was to produce only its own kind. Thus, God meant that the change of one kind into another did not exist.

However God did not say that  there could be no changes within the family. He did not create all the different color varieties of dogs, cats, horses, etc. at the very beginning. There were only pares: a male and female of each species, and many changes occurred since that time to produce a great variety within the family. But cats always remained cats, dogs are still dogs, and men are still men. Mutation was responsible only for producing a new variety of the same species, but never promoted the appearance of another new kind.

The "common ancestor" that evolution demands has never existed. There is no "missing link." Man and monkeys are supposed to stem from the same animal ancestry! But even  various groups of  monkeys differ much from each other. All of them are different. Their blood is different, they have different genes and they are breed only with the partners of their own kind.

Despite of it  some  people still are set by a question: chimpanzees, orangutans  are so similar to people, and may be a Neanderthal was that transitive link from  monkey to a man? The new achievements of a Genetic science have allowed to break in ashes and this myth. Found 27 distinctions in mitochondrial DNA between a  man and a Neanderthal  and 55 distinctions between a man and  chimpanzee ** allow confidently to assert, that a man, a Neanderthal and a Chimpanzee are  different kinds, and there is nothing common in them.  Moreover, the recent researches (2000) showed, that 223 genes of a man were not similar to any known genes of some other organic form of life. All this proves the fact that a man did not develop independently from anything. However for supporters of the theory of evolution it still not enough , now they try to prove, that the genes changed under the influence of bacterium. Good luck.

During several decades in  school textbooks the picture was demonstrated, where human’s embryo was compared with other animal`s embryos . It was the main argument for the benefit of  the evolution: the embryos were alike. Dr. Michael Richardson, embryologist at St. George's Medical School in London together with the group of other scientists decided to repeat the experiments with the growing embryos of 39 different species. In 1997 Dr. Richardson said in his interview for “London Times”: " This is one of the worst cases of scientific fraud. It's shocking to find that somebody one thought was a great scientist was deliberately misleading. It makes me angry. What Haeckel did was to take a human embryo and copy it, pretending that the salamander and the pig and all the others looked the same at the same stage of development. They don't. These are fakes."

*G. G. Simpson in«The Major Features of Evolution», p. 96.
** A man has 46 chromosomes and a chimpanzee has 48.

contents    page 38    page 40